Donations

Governments attempting to counter Sovereignty Movement: Understanding when we are winning!

Sovereign Union Media Release - 18 February 2015
pdf Governments attempting to counter Sovereighty Movement pdf

After 227 years of military occupation by the British, we have reached a highly significant position in our history. The invaders never thought the day would come when Aboriginal Nations and Peoples would be such a powerful force in the Australian political arena.

The first mention of 'Recognition' was in 2007 when Prime Minister John Howard announced that if he was re-elected, he will put a referendum to the Australian people to formally recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution. John Howard's statement was made during the same period of government when he opposed the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, opposed a Treaty and following his suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act to introduce of the Northern Territory Intervention.
Audio: ABC Report 11 October 2007

Media Release

Ghillar Michael Anderson 18 February 2015

Governments try to counter Sovereignty Movement: Understanding when we are winning!

NITV ran a news item on 17/2/15 reporting that the NSW government and the Electoral Office are calling on Aboriginal people to enrol to vote at the next NSW State election.

This call, it is said, is influenced by the impact of the Sovereignty Movement. After 227 years of military occupation by the British, we have reached a highly significant position in our history. The invaders never thought the day would come when Aboriginal Nations and Peoples would be such a powerful force in the Australian political arena.

No doubt the same appeal to enroll to vote will apply at the Federal election in 2016, or 17 January 2017 at the latest.

Since the Sovereignty movement has gathered strength, the governments are becoming more desperate in trying to convince First Nations peoples and non-Aboriginal Australians to Vote for Constitutional Reform (Recognise Campaign)

(Image: Gordon Syron's Judgement by his Peers - 1978)

We must understand that, as affirmed by the High Court Mabo (No. 2) judgment, our ancient cultures and Laws have survived British sovereignty and remain the Law of the Land, as they have never been ceded in anyway, shape or form.

Aboriginal people are now challenging more than ever the power and authority of the colonial governments.

The Commonwealth, State and Territory governments are trying to deceive our people yet again by suggesting that our people are 'Australians' and that they should be part of Australia and vote.

I think its time to revisit a speech by Menzies, as the Hansard record of 1 April 1965 makes it clear that Aboriginal people are not Australian citizens. [See below in 'Background'].

The only power that keeps government control over us as Peoples are the courts in this country. Courts argue that if English laws were to offer protection to us as people, then the courts rule that we must surely be subject to their laws. But we need to make the point that our people need to understand that we have never been British subjects. As detailed in Quick and Garran's 1901 work on the Australian constitution, if you are not a British subject you are an 'alien' by definition [eg at page 599].

This is a discussion that must be fully examined because like the foreigners in Section 44 of the constitution, if we were neither British subjects nor Australian citizens, then how did we become Australian citizens and subjects of Australia without naturalisation and citizenship certificates being issued?

I revisit the comment I have made previously - have a look at all the Commonwealth legislation affecting our peoples and you will read in the preamble reference to 'the aboriginal race' eg in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 [No. 150, 1989 as amended]:

"WHEREAS the people of Australia voted overwhelmingly to amend the Constitution so that the Parliament of Australia would be able to make special laws for peoples of the aboriginal race;"

Don't be fooled by the call to join the Electoral Roll. The governments are not our friends at the crunch. They are con artists and tricksters. The Recognise campaign is in the same mould, heavily funded to create spin to lure Aboriginal people into the racist Australian Constitution, which only promises assimilation and token recognition. But the bottom line is - the Commonwealth's funding of the Recognise campaign to include Aboriginal people in the Australian constitution is surely proof enough that we are not already in the Australian constitution and therefore are not citizens and, by definition, are 'aliens'.

We must stay true to our own culture and keep our identity intact. Don't sell out for a vote!

The governments have taken over our natural resources and claim ownership of our culture. The courts deny the true nature and history of our Nations and Peoples and protect their masters who created them, knowing that it is against international law.

Contact: Ghillar Michael Anderson
Convenor of the Sovereign Union and Head of State of the Euahlayi Peoples Republic
Contact Details here
Background:

1. http://nationalunitygovernment.org/content/sovereign-treaty-only-constit...

2. Former PM Robert Menzies on the Race Power:


Former Prime Minister
Robert Menzies (1894–1978)
Painted by David Poole, 1971

In the Australian parliamentary debates on the proposed amendment to the two sections of the constitution, Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies expressed concern about the possible legal outcomes when he said at 533 and 534 Hansard No. 13, Thursday, 1 April 1965 TWENTY-FIFTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION - THIRD PERIOD:
 

"... the removal of what has been called the "discriminatory provisions" of section 51. On that I would, with great respect, challenge the assumption that is made. May I read the provision to the House in order to refresh its memory. Section 51 states- The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:- (xxvi.) The people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws: It has been suggested that that provision discriminates against the Aborigines of Australia. I would have thought that the contrary was the fact. Parliament has been given power to make discriminatory laws in relation to the people of any race-special laws which would relate to them and not to other people; laws which would treat them as people who stood outside the normal grasp of the law, enjoying its benefits and sustaining its burdens in common with all other citizens. I would have thought that the perfect state of affairs in Australia would be that any Aboriginal citizen felt that he did stand equal with every other citizen before the law, enjoyed its benefits and took his own part on a proper basis in sustaining its burdens. I have no doubt whatever that this provision in the Constitution was designed having regard to conditions that existed at that time and the possibility of having to make a special law dealing with, for example, kanaka labourers-perhaps a special law to deport them from .the country or to confine them to some particular area. There was a good deal of discussion about this at the time this provision was framed. Therefore the framers of the Constitution inserted this provision, but they left out the Aboriginal race because they did not want to discriminate against the people of the aboriginal race. All we have to do now is to cross out this reference "other than the aboriginal race" and we confer on this Parliament a power to make a special law which relates to the Aborigines and to no other people.
Mr Reynolds.- But
Sir ROBERT MENZIES.-If you do not mind I want to pursue this. I do not think it is at all out of place. There is a second point about it, and this does concern me. If the Commonwealth, as one of its heads of power under section 51, has the right to pass special laws with respect to the Aboriginal race, I wonder what limitations will be on that separate head of power. Would this enable the Parliament to set up a separate body of industrial laws relating to Aborigines or some other kind of law- health laws, quarantine laws or laws under any of the other powers of the Parliament? It may well be true that it could because, make no mistake about it; this would be a head of power standing not inferior to any other power contained in section 51. That is a matter that requires a great deal of thought. I do not want honorable members to think that I have arrived at some positive conclusion about it. I am raising it here in order to indicate that it wants a good deal of thought and that we would want to give it a great deal more investigation than we have before we favoured changing the provision in section 51. But we would be very happy to see the end of section 127."

3. Making 'special laws for peoples of the aboriginal race'.

The preambular statement to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 (Indigenous Land Corporation) states in Commonwealth legislation that the purpose and functions of the Act establishing the Indigenous Land Corporation (ILC) was:

An Act to establish a Torres Strait Regional Authority, an Indigenous Land Corporation and a corporation to be known as Indigenous Business Australia, and for related purposes
WHEREAS the people of Australia voted overwhelmingly to amend the Constitution so that the Parliament of Australia would be able to make special laws for peoples of the aboriginal race;
AND WHEREAS the people whose descendants are now known as Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders were the inhabitants of Australia before European settlement;
AND WHEREAS they have been progressively dispossessed of their lands and this dispossession occurred largely without compensation, and successive governments have failed to reach a lasting and equitable agreement with Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders concerning the use of their lands;
AND WHEREAS it is the intention of the people of Australia to make provision for rectification, by such measures as are agreed by the Parliament from time to time, including the measures referred to in this Act, of the consequences of past injustices and to ensure that Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders receive that full recognition within the Australian nation to which history, their prior rights and interests, and their rich and diverse culture, fully entitle them to aspire;
AND WHEREAS it is also the wish of the people of Australia that there be reached with Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders a real and lasting reconciliation of these matters;
AND WHEREAS it is the firm objective of the people of Australia that policies be maintained and developed by the Australian Government that will overcome disadvantages of Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders to facilitate the enjoyment of their culture;
AND WHEREAS it is appropriate to further the aforementioned objective in a manner that is consistent with the aims of self-management and self-sufficiency for Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders;
AND WHEREAS it is also appropriate to establish structures to represent Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders to ensure maximum participation of Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders in the formulation and implementation of programs and to provide them with an effective voice within the Australian Government;
AND WHEREAS the Parliament seeks to enable Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders to increase their economic status, promote their social well-being and improve the provision of community services;
AND WHEREAS the Australian Government has acted to protect the rights of all of its citizens, and in particular its indigenous peoples, by recognising international standards for the protection of universal human rights and fundamental freedoms through:
  1. (a) the ratification of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and other standard-setting instruments such as the International Covenants on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and on Civil and Political Rights; and
  2. (b) the acceptance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: